Design¶
With the internal forces from the structural analysis, SPX designs the circular reinforced concrete section in accordance with NBR 6118.
There are two checks: biaxial bending with axial force (longitudinal reinforcement) and shear (transverse reinforcement).
Biaxial bending with axial force¶
Design forces¶
The maxima are taken from the two models — X axis and Y axis —, and the resultant moment is combined vectorially:
with \(\gamma_f = 1.4\).
The vector combination is legitimate for a circular section, which has no preferred direction: any moment direction meets the same geometry and the same distribution of reinforcement.
Stress block parameters¶
According to the concrete class:
The design strengths come from \(\gamma_c = 1.4\) and \(\gamma_s = 1.15\), with \(\sigma_{cd} = \alpha_c f_{cd}\).
Second-order effects¶
The slenderness ratio uses the radius of gyration of the circular section (\(i = D/4\)):
For \(40 < \lambda \le 140\), the second-order moment is added by the standard-column method with approximate curvature:
with the curvature limited by
The total design moment is \(M_d = M_{d,1^a} + M_{2d}\).
Above λ = 140
NBR 6118 requires more rigorous methods for \(\lambda > 140\). The program does not add second-order effects in this range — it is up to the designer to check whether the slenderness is acceptable and, if so, to handle it with a specific analysis.
Reinforcement not required¶
Reinforcement can be omitted when the compressive stress is low enough:
Even so, a minimum detailing reinforcement is usually adopted for other reasons — lifting, driving, tying into the cap.
Interaction diagram¶
The program builds the \(N\)–\(M\) interaction diagram of the section with the adopted reinforcement and checks whether the pair \((N_d, M_d)\) falls inside it. It is the most transparent check possible: you see the margin, not just the verdict.
The minimum number of bars is 6, as required by the code for a circular section.
Shear¶
Design force¶
The shear is combined vectorially from the two models:
Strut check¶
First, concrete crushing:
If \(\tau_{wd} > \tau_{wu}\), the section is insufficient and the program refuses the design: no reinforcement can fix strut crushing, only increasing the diameter or the concrete strength.
For the circular section, \(b_w = D\) and \(d = D - c - \phi_t - \phi_\ell/2\) are adopted.
Transverse reinforcement¶
By Model I of NBR 6118 (struts at 45°):
with minimum reinforcement
Adopted spacing¶
The spacing is the smallest of three criteria — and the program shows which one governed:
| Criterion | Limit |
|---|---|
| Theoretical | From the calculated \(A_{sw}/s\) |
| Code (ULS) | \(\min(0.6d;\,30\text{ cm})\), or \(\min(0.3d;\,20\text{ cm})\) if \(\tau_{wd} > 0.67\,\tau_{wu}\) |
| Detailing | \(\min(20\text{ cm};\, D;\, 12\phi_\ell)\) |
With a lower bound of 5 cm — below that the concrete cannot be placed.
Minimum stirrup diameter
\(\phi_t \ge \max(5\text{ mm};\, \phi_\ell/4)\). A 5.0 mm stirrup is calculated with \(f_{ywk} = 600\) MPa (CA-60); above that, 500 MPa.
Limits of validity¶
Range of application
- The design covers a solid circular section. Hollow, steel or composite sections are not covered.
- The vector combination of forces assumes that the X and Y maxima occur at the same section, which is conservative when they do not.
- Second-order effects are only handled in the range \(40 < \lambda \le 140\).
- The following are not checked: fatigue, cracking in service, transient driving or lifting situations, nor the anchorage of the reinforcement in the cap.
- The buckling length \(\ell_e\) is an input. Determining it for a partially embedded pile requires judgement — the embedded length is restrained by the soil, but the stiffness of that restraint depends on \(K_h\) itself.